Depends on what you consider "acceptable". I find that my m.Zuiko
14-150 (a much lesser lens I'm sure) is perfectly acceptable to me for
most of what I shoot. I'll use the 12-50 as (I think) a better optic if
I think what I'm going to shoot will be in range. But the 14-150 is a
great walk-around lens.
Chuck Norcutt
On 2/16/2014 9:43 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> I find it hard to believe that a lens with a zoom range of more than 10x
> would deliver acceptable images.
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>
> YNWA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 16, 2014, at 3:41 PM, DZDub wrote:
>
>> Anyone using one of these with an E-thingie? I understand it's the bee's
>> knees among lenses that cover this range but wonder if there is any
>> compromise in using it with a non-Panny, non-Leica body. Can't see why,
>> but it's a lot of money used and hard to find!
>>
>> Joel W.
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|