Subject: | Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:18:52 -0500 |
How sure are you of that? In the example I gave earlier of my grandson throwing a baseball at an assumed 45mph the speed of the ball is 66 feet/second. When the E-M5 is set to its fast frame rate of 240 frames/second the ball travels 3.3 inches between frames. I do argue the math. Sounds good enough for me. I think it visual presentation at the highest frame rate is probably faster than my eye/brain perception and certainly much faster than my reaction times. Chuck Norcutt On 2/16/2014 2:34 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote: >> It's hard for me to believe that the viewfinder electronics adds anything >> significant to the 340ms total >> already there. >> >> Chuck Norcutt > I guess it hinges upon the definition of " significant". I won't argue > the math but I dispute that each ms is to be weighted equally. With an > EVF we don't even see the point the ball leaves the hand so all > presumptions of its trajectory are skewed. At the very least we are a > few trial shots behind a real time view. > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] PESO: salt mountain, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] PESO: salt mountain, Nathan Wajsman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again, Mike Lazzari |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again, Mike Lazzari |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |