Subject: | Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again |
---|---|
From: | "Sawyer, Edward" <Ed.Sawyer@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 16 Feb 2014 14:29:21 +0000 |
The delay on the Canon eos 1v is 45-50msec, as I recall. It was a record at the time, and I think is still among the fastest. The EOS 1N RS is probably even faster, with the pellicle mirror. On Feb 16, 2014, at 5:05 AM, "olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again > To: Olympus Camera Discussion <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <52FFBEDE.90803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > But I think what you've failed to address here is that I've shown that > my own reaction time is about 2/3 of the total response time. Even with > the shutter shock delay time the camera's response is the smaller part. > A DSLR still has to open the mirror before firing the shutter, > something the E-M5 doesn't have to do. > > Chuck Norcutt -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Kiev demonstrations, Sawyer, Edward |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OT: Weather Patterns, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |