Subject: | Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again |
---|---|
From: | Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:34:04 -0800 |
> It's hard for me to believe that the viewfinder electronics adds anything > significant to the 340ms total > already there. > > Chuck Norcutt I guess it hinges upon the definition of " significant". I won't argue the math but I dispute that each ms is to be weighted equally. With an EVF we don't even see the point the ball leaves the hand so all presumptions of its trajectory are skewed. At the very least we are a few trial shots behind a real time view. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Panasonic/Leica D Vario-Elmar 14-150, DZDub |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Belgian beer is just too good, Nathan Wajsman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |