6cm --> 6" would be a magnification of about 2.5.
...Wayne
>
> Well I was obviously wrong about you quoting 6x17" as a print size rather
> than a ratio and Ken said. 450-600mm equates (roughly) to 18-24". I
assume
> that's the long side and that a 6x17 ratio would be about 6-8" on the
short
> side. That would be a print magnification of about 7-10X a 6x17cm
negative.
> Is that about right?
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 2/4/2014 9:16 AM, bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Some DID buy 6 x 17 format, of which I had none.
> >
> > Size? 6 x
> > 17, I'm thinking of from 450 to 600 mm. You convert; I'm too tired.
> --
> __________________________________________________________
> _______
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|