Not really. The only drastic change is exposure and I always double click
on that to bring it back to how I exposed it. LR tends to way over-expose.
The other sliders barely move.
Tina
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Jez Cunningham <jez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But hitting 'auto' in LR is so extreme that you'd be hard pressed to
> make meaningful comparison.
>
> On 23/11/2013, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I was mistaken about equivalent exposures on the EXIF data. Now that I
> > take another look at it I see that they both have the same aperture but
> > the 21mm has a 2/3 stop greater exposure than the 35mm. It's 1/3 stop
> > more sensitive on ISO and 1/3 stop greater exposure time on shutter
> > speed. I'd have thought the exposure bias would be in the opposite
> > direction. I'd expect the wider angle lens to see more sky and give the
> > scene less exposure. From the EXIF data:
> >
> > Focal Length 35 mm 21 mm
> > Exposure Time 1/125 sec 1/91 sec
> > Aperture f/4.8 f/4.8
> > ISO Equivalent 160 200
> >
> > Chuck Norcutt
> >
> >
> > On 11/22/2013 6:40 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
> >> LR didn't do much at all. The 21 mm lens brings in a lot more light
> than
> >> the 35 and the 50 dims it even more. I didn't have any exposure
> >> compensation set on any of the three cameras. I think it's just the
> >> difference in the amount of light the various lens lengths let in. I
> >> normally have all cameras set on center-weighted exposure which would
> >> make
> >> difference over averaged exposure.
> >>
> >> Tina
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Chuck Norcutt <
> >> chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Both color images have equivalent exposures recorded in the EXIF data
> >>> but the 21mm image is *much brighter* than the 35mm image. What do
> >>> these things look like before LR was allowed to play with them?
> >>>
> >>> Chuck Norcutt
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 11/22/2013 3:22 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
> >>>> PESO:
> >>>>
> >>>> I've just now started downloading all of the photos from my trip to
> >>>> Italy
> >>>> but I thought it would be fun to compare the three cameras that I
> took.
> >>>> Each one had a different lens which will also make a difference!
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/153485285
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/153485286
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/153485287
> >>>>
> >>>> They were all three processed minimally in LR by just hitting Auto and
> >>>> adding a small amount of Clarity and Vibrance. I'm sure I'll work on
> >>> them
> >>>> some more but I wanted to compare the cameras, not the processing.
> >>> Maybe I
> >>>> should post a 100% crop from each?
> >>>>
> >>>> C&C greatly appreciated.
> >>>>
> >>>> Tina
> >>>>
> >>> --
> >>> _________________________________________________________________
> >>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> >>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> >>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> >
> >
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
>
--
Tina Manley
http:// <http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/>www.tinamanley.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|