Subject: | Re: [OM] IMG: Comparison |
---|---|
From: | Chris Trask <christrask@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 23 Nov 2013 07:51:04 -0700 (GMT-07:00) |
> >I've just now started downloading all of the photos from my trip to Italy >but I thought it would be fun to compare the three cameras that I took. > Each one had a different lens which will also make a difference! > >http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/153485285 > >http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/153485286 > >http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/153485287 > >They were all three processed minimally in LR by just hitting Auto and >adding a small amount of Clarity and Vibrance. I'm sure I'll work on them >some more but I wanted to compare the cameras, not the processing. Maybe I >should post a 100% crop from each? > I like the second one best as it shows the street environment, which improves the depth of the photo. The other two lack any features in the background or horizon to justify the cropping. Chris -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] What a difference light makes, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] IMGS: Duomo Dome, Chris Trask |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] IMG: Comparison, philippe . amard |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Nathan's PAD 22/11/2013: olive oil, Nathan Wajsman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |