Subject: | Re: [OM] IMG: Comparison |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:35:17 -0500 |
Both color images have equivalent exposures recorded in the EXIF data but the 21mm image is *much brighter* than the 35mm image. What do these things look like before LR was allowed to play with them? Chuck Norcutt On 11/22/2013 3:22 PM, Tina Manley wrote: > PESO: > > I've just now started downloading all of the photos from my trip to Italy > but I thought it would be fun to compare the three cameras that I took. > Each one had a different lens which will also make a difference! > > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/153485285 > > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/153485286 > > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/153485287 > > They were all three processed minimally in LR by just hitting Auto and > adding a small amount of Clarity and Vibrance. I'm sure I'll work on them > some more but I wanted to compare the cameras, not the processing. Maybe I > should post a 100% crop from each? > > C&C greatly appreciated. > > Tina > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMGS: Duomo Dome, Tina Manley |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Comparison, Tina Manley |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] IMG: Comparison, Tina Manley |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] IMG: Comparison, Tina Manley |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |