So.... instead of the 21mm f2, I should get a 28mm f2 instead? Sure
would be easier on the pocket book.
And to cloud the issue, what about the 24mm f2?
regards
Vick
On 20/06/2013 1:02 PM, Bill Pearce wrote:
> To answer in one sentence, so good that mine's not for sale. A little
> deeper, it is amazing, although not as good as the 28/2. The 28 is almost
> zeiss-like in its sharpness and clarity, the 21 is just good but not in so
> dramatic a way. The 21 is, I think, the best really wide lens ever. No
> problems with strange flares and such if handled properly. Not only should
> you own one, you NEED one.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|