Alamy has a very good summary of licensing:
http://www.alamy.com/contributor/help/image-licences.asp
Any of mine that have people are RM. I never used to license RF at all but
it's necessary these days to make a living. RF and micro-stock have ruined
the stock photography business.
Tina
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Noted, AndrewF (but you would have felt guilty if you had ended the clause
> with a preposition).
>
> I find this thread on stock images very interesting as I have never taken
> the time to understand the different licences or their relative benefits.
>
> Chris
>
> On 14 May 2013, at 02:17, Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I can imagine, but it's tricky.
> > For instance, if an image is used in a magazine as part of a feature,
> that's editorial. But if the same image is used on the cover, that's an
> inducement to buy and hence 'commercial' and requires a release. The
> magazine for which I write (note that, Barker) has a strict policy of stock
> photos only on the cover for that reason. It would be interesting to ask
> whether the same rules apply to web sites - home page versus feature pages.
> Its possible, but untested.
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
>
--
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|