Re: [OM] IMG: 40,000!

[Chris Barker]

Noted, AndrewF (but you would have felt guilty if you had ended the clause with 
a preposition).

I find this thread on stock images very interesting as I have never taken the 
time to understand the different licences or their relative benefits.

Chris

On 14 May 2013, at 02:17, Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I can imagine, but it's tricky.
> For instance, if an image is used in a magazine as part of a feature, that's 
> editorial. But if the same image is used on the cover, that's an inducement 
> to buy and hence 'commercial' and requires a release. The magazine for which 
> I write (note that, Barker) has a strict policy of stock photos only on the 
> cover for that reason. It would be interesting to ask whether the same rules 
> apply to web sites - home page versus feature pages. Its possible, but 
> untested.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/