> Decrying Chuck's alleged 'universal solution' is neither worser nor more
> better (!) than your assertion that his circumstances are unique! But you no
> doubt made the point that way on purpose, no?
I was just throwing another irony in the fire. But I can live without
the condescending tones that sometimes accompany such comparisons.
> I can't speak for Chuck's vision, nor any aspect of the performance of a 5D
> or an E-M5, but I can speak for the ease (or not) of using manual focus
> lenses on E-1/3/5/330/420/450/510, with and without focus confirmation. My
> experience echoes Chuck's.
I certainly understand the limitations of manual focusing with some of
the bodies. My DMC-L1 is pretty well a GWN* in that regard. E-1, less
so. The fact is, if we had decent focus screens like the 2-13 in an OM
body, then we wouldn't be barking quite so much.
*Gut Wrenching Nightmare
--
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|