Sorry, Mike. I do not appreciate being called a "denier" or implicity a
religious fundamentalist and therefore anti-evolution. I do not deny
that the earth is warming, I am not religious (least of all
fundamentalist), I firmly support evolution and I am very well aware of
the difference between theory and hypothesis. I am also well aware of
the scientific method. Name calling is a political method and not a
scientific method. Unfortunately, climate science is now more politics
than science.
Chuck Norcutt
On 12/5/2012 3:03 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
>> they simply disagree with the science.
> I think that there is confusion in the general population with
> scientific method. I keep hearing religious fundamentalists say that
> evolution is just a "theory". They are obviously mixing up theory with
> hypothesis.
>
> In this case what many scientists agree on is that climate change is
> happening but the details still need to be worked out. When scientists
> critique a study it is seized upon by deniers as proof that the
> scientific community is divided. The community is divided... like about 99:1
>
> Mike
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|