I believe the Big Dogs call this defocusing. It's a technique most used to
judge your composition without the actual subject mucking with your opinion of
your shot. You see colors and patterns and such without being distracted by the
actual subject. Apparently, however, the defocused versions sometimes excel.
--Bob, Sharp & Clear
On May 4, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Moose wrote:
> On 5/3/2012 6:04 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> Throw some paint on number 1 and you have a winner. :-)
> On 5/3/2012 3:41 PM, SwissPace wrote:
>>> I was moosing around and also thinking about bokeh when I thought what
>>> happens If I take my most expensive lens 180/2 and intentionally not
>>> focus correctly ?
>>>
>>> this is my attempt at art
>>>
>>> <http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/Other/OMlist/6716762_2V976W#!i=1827263286&k=BJVcsFh&lb=1&s=L>
>
> That's nice!
>
> I like to do some such images from time to time.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Travel/NorthEast_2010/Coastal%20Maine/Mt_Desert_and_Acadia/Miscellaneous&image=_MG_1250.jpg>
>
> I haven't painted one as yet, but I pretend.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Travel/NorthEast_2010/Coastal%20Maine/Mt_Desert_and_Acadia/Miscellaneous&image=_MG_1250imp.jpg>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|