Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-D EM-5 review at dpreview |
---|---|
From: | Frank Wijsmuller <wijsmuller@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 3 May 2012 23:45:48 +0200 |
Agreed. But it is a CIPA figure (Japanese trade body Camera and Imaging Products Association), so it makes them comparable at least. Best, Frank. 2012/5/3 Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> > The shot count per battery charge is a little misleading. The main > factor is the time the display is on. I typically have my cameras go > to sleep after one minute. So when I'm shooting events I'm not burning > up the battery during lulls in the action. But when things are > happining, I'll tap the shutter release periodically to keep the > camera alive. > > AG > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ > > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-D EM-5 review at dpreview, Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-D EM-5 review at dpreview, Bill Pearce |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-D EM-5 review at dpreview, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | [OM] OM-D EM-5 review at dpreview, usher99 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |