Well, OK, there's a reason except that my printing is nowhere near as
sophisticated as requiring soft proofing for different papers.
Chuck Norcutt
On 3/24/2012 2:21 PM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
> Wait until you start printing with LR4. Soft-proofing is a wonder in
> and of itself. I used to do it in CS5 on the original image, and if I
> soft-proofed for different papers, each paper had its own layer.
> Imagine the room for mistakes there when doing a hurry-up print job.
> LR4, on the other hand, offers you the option of making a virtual
> soft-proof copy, which you can adjust as you see fit, print and
> fiddle to your hearts content, and then the soft-proofed copy sits in
> your catalogue next to the original and even includes the name of the
> paper it's been proofed for.
>
> I can't wait to get into the printing flow over the next couple of
> weeks to push LR4. I think it may be a genuine gift of the gods.<g>
>
> --Bob
>
>
> On Mar 24, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>
>> Jez, give it up. The concepts of non-destructive editing and the
>> file handling of Lightroom (or rather, the lack thereof) are just
>> too innovative for some people. I think LR is the greatest piece of
>> photo processing software ever invented, but I recognize that in
>> other areas I am set in my ways and have a similar attitude to that
>> shown by Chuck and Jim.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|