> I got caned recently for describing the Fuji X-pro as a 'rangefinder' but,
> to be honest, how else can you describe it?
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's either a duck or
AFLAC. I consider it a rangefinder camera with evolved technology.
> I'm attempting to write a book on the evolutionary history of the SLR - wait
> for it and then you'll really have something to beat me up about.
Hiring the thugs now.
Technically, the E-10 and E-20 were SLRs. They used "reflex"
technology for the viewfinder. But were they really SLRs? They didn't
take interchangeable lenses.
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|