You could argue that it IS a DSLR but not an SLR.
After all, it gives you an image through the lens.
And what about the Sony alpha's?
I think that the term SLR now means - 'it's a bit bigger and has a pointy thing
on top...like, y'know, in the middle.'
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.soultheft.com
On 15/03/2012, at 10:36 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I can't comment on build quality but will note that the OM-D is not
> technically a DSLR.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|