Ian
Thanks for that. I have had very good results with Aperture and my lovely new
Pixma 9500-II. It looks as if LR4 is catching up with Aperture in some
respects, soft-proofing, for instance. But I know that many people prefer LR
to Aperture.
I'm waiting for the next version of Aperture; I can't afford the time to change
systems now.
Chris
On 6 Mar 2012, at 14:48, SwissPace wrote:
> With my recent printing woes from aperture I gave LR4beta a try and I
> must be honest printing wise it wins hands down compared to Aperture, so
> if you have a mac and plan to print images then LR4 is much much
> better, however despite Bob's views on shadow highlight recovery I think
> Aperture just edges it, BUT I have been using aperture about 5 years and
> LR4 5 days. I still prefer Apetures Library functions but the savings
> in paper alone make it worth me exporting to LR4 for printing (it
> betters CS5 because its easy to print multiple images on one page).
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|