I should have said bargain priced compared to LR3 (still twice the price
of Aperture)
On 06/03/2012 15:48, SwissPace wrote:
> With my recent printing woes from aperture I gave LR4beta a try and I
> must be honest printing wise it wins hands down compared to Aperture, so
> if you have a mac and plan to print images then LR4 is much much
> better, however despite Bob's views on shadow highlight recovery I think
> Aperture just edges it, BUT I have been using aperture about 5 years and
> LR4 5 days. I still prefer Apetures Library functions but the savings
> in paper alone make it worth me exporting to LR4 for printing (it
> betters CS5 because its easy to print multiple images on one page).
>
> I would possibly switch totally to LR4 but I have some expensive
> plugin's for Aperture, but If I find myself not needing them well then
> its a big chance I will switch.
>
> I am so glad I didn't listen to web advice to buy LR3 discounted to take
> advantage of adobe's upgrade offer thinking they would price it as LR3
>
> IanW
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|