Yes, and it's the more serious problem. With a 4/3 sensor it takes two
full stops larger aperture to get the same shallow depth of field.
Chuck Norcutt
On 2/9/2012 12:21 AM, Moose wrote:
> On 2/8/2012 7:34 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>> I'm sure Olympus thinks that way but I don't think we do. :-)
>> As previously mentioned, they redefined Guide Number from industry
>> standard ISO 100 to 200 to make the ratings look better. Why not this
>> too?
>
> As also already mentioned, it's not just about effective exposure. There's
> also the DOF issue.
>
> Field Depths Moose
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|