>
> > Well, nothing to get excited about. Flash synchro is maxxed out at
> > 1/250 with bundled flash (no built-in flash). Imaging sensor is 16.9M.
> > Hot shoe flash attachment. No cable remote connection. Minimum ISO
> > is 200.
>
> There are enough omissions to drive a truck through, but at what point
have
> we reached a point of sufficiency?
>
That may very likely be the case. Moving forward is one thing, but I
don't see any significant forward motion here.
>
> Sensor is evolutionary upgrade, but with a few new nifty tricks. As I
> said before, we don't buy Olympus for the specifications.
>
No, we don't. I've stayed with it for over 35 years now, mostly because
of durability, reliability, and flexibility. Like staying with Toyota. I
won't get excited about sensors until I see 32M at the same price as 12M.
The difference will be that going from 8M in the E-500 to 32M means twice as
many pixels in both directions.
>
> I can live with 1/250 sync. For the vast majority of my photography, a
> sensor in the high teens is adequate. The minimum normal ISO of 200 is
> bothersome, but it hasn't stopped Nikon from selling zillions of cameras.
>
The 1/250 sync is a bit of an improvement as the E-500 etc. is limited
to 1/160, though I've not encountered any problems. I just add an ND filter
to make the adjustment.
Are we simply looking at a camera whose ony significant feature is a
return to the "OM-xxx" model numbering for legacy recognition?
Inquiring BTE operating systems want to know.
Chris
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|