On Thu, Jan 26, 2012, at 01:56 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
> > Whatever the OM-D turns out to be it will undoubtedly be a micro 4/3
> > camera. That won't get me back, at least as my main shooter.
>
> I have my own personal list of checkboxes which are automatic filters.
> If certain ones aren't ticked, then the decision to not buy it is
> easy. My wife says that laundry and dishes are minimal
> requirements--especially since it's supposed to be weather-sealed.
>
> Wise woman as she is, she has observed that whatever this new model
> is, don't expect a followup model from Olympus--ever. And if another
> one does come along, it won't be anything like this one.
This is why the only thing that makes sense of the hype is that it is a
FF EVIL system. A m4/3 body with built-in EVF is so yesterday that they
wouldn't waste their coyness on it.
The problem for us is that we probably don't have a single lens of any
kind that will mount, or will ever mount, on a FF EVIL body.
Joel (hoping I'm right and I'm wrong) W.
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Access all of your messages and folders
wherever you are
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|