Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] ( OM) Olympus Corp woes

Subject: Re: [OM] ( OM) Olympus Corp woes
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:42:30 +1100
I'd be more outraged by the opening split infinitive.
:-)
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 13/12/2011, at 11:18 PM, Chris Barker wrote:

> What on earth does the "literally" mean?  What part does it play in that 
> sentence?
> 
> That word was so useful before ignoramuses started using it for emphasis, 
> ignoring its meaning.
> 
> Chris (grumpy)
> :-)
> 
> On 13 Dec 2011, at 09:28, Piers Hemy wrote:
> 
>> Olympus had originally been a sound company, with diligent employees and
>> high technical strength. Not all part of the company was involved in this
>> misconduct. Olympus should remove its malignant tumor and literally renew
>> itself.
>> END
>> 
>> In light of those words, it is no surprise that most of the board will now
>> go (which I think is the current state of play). And I assume that Mr
>> Woodford is now working diligently with some major shareholders to lead a
>> new team - because "they" the shareholders will be appointing the successor
>> board.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz