Hi Moose,
I shot it from an open garage door, through a light rain, so I never
expected a winner. I was surprised that it came out as well as it did, and,
I agree, you have improved on it.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] (OM) Rose of Sharon
> On 9/6/2011 7:04 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> The RoS picture exhibits the tonal and color depth when I'd expect to see
>> from Velvia or in a pinch from the E-1. It's MUCH easier with film, but
>> the
>> E-1 seems to do it better than the average digital bear.
>
> I am not convinced by all this praise of the image. I like the
> composition, rainy look and overall color.
>
> However, the bright blooms are overexposed, with resultant loss of subtle
> color and texture detail. Some overlapping
> edges of petals are not clearly delineated, as well.
>
> I've not seen a RoS in some time, and never this one, so details may be
> off. Still consider the smooth, subtle
> graduation of color from the dark center out to the edges, not just dark
> center - bang, all white. Also notice greater
> texture in petal surfaces and better defined petal edges where they
> overlap.
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Nichols/Rose_of_Sharon_001.htm>
>
> Highlights are still a bit clipped, but the effect is not nearly as bad.
>
> Moose
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|