An "acceptable source" of what?
jh
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Fildes" <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] long night time exposures
> #1 son would point out that The Times is the only one regarded as an
> acceptable source in a courtroom.
> He mentions a recent scary moment in which he was writing a (not too
> complimentary) story about Rupert just as the man himself walked past his
> desk.
> I think the measure of their quality is how they reported that story - he
> felt that they were just as critical as the opposition.
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On 01/09/2011, at 10:41 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
>
>> John
>>
>> Thanks for asking. I read the Independent at home, and the online
>> version is well laid out. The Telegraph on Saturday is great for Money
>> and Motoring (Honest John is the best ever motoring section, for my
>> money). I would read the Guardian (except for Polly Toynbee), but I've
>> never looked at it online, only on paper. The Times is OK, I have to
>> admit, but I don't read any News International papers on principle; nor
>> will I watch any Sky TV now, even though I know that Sky News is a pretty
>> good news channel.
>>
>> The Daily Mail is good only for a laugh, it makes up so much; the
>> Telegraph is a lot like it sometimes. The Evening Standard is owned by
>> the Mail lot, so is rubbish. The Daily Express is a joke, of course . .
>> .
>>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|