Not sure what hoops I had to jump through to make it work. I just installed it
some years ago, and have been a happy camper ever since. LR is the first
program that lets me manage the entire workflow, from the RAW file out of the
camera to the finished image on the web or on paper, in one seamless package.
I cannot remember what I did without LR, but surely it involved performing
various unnatural acts on the pixels, using several pieces of software. Never
again!.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
YNWA
On May 24, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>
>
> Honestly, I really do like Lightroom. It has serious issues in some
> areas, though--especially in memory management. I find it incredible
> the expensive hoops people jump through to make it sing. Aperture
> seems pretty well sorted in comparison.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|