Re: [OM] Definition of "Normal"

[Brian Swale]

Bob W wrote
> I wonder if
> the 16:9 aspect ration will begin to emerge as a preferred ratio for
> photographic prints? I've done a couple that way, and I have to admit
> they're rather pleasing to the eye.

So long as they don't include the distortion I see all too often when I 
(rarely) 
see TV here on the new wide screens; every body and face is squidged out 
to fat/wide and correct horizontal  proportions are totally lost.. 
It's amazing; regular viewers don't seem to notice/care, but. (To incorporate 
some Australian slang which puts the word "but" at the end of many 
sentences).

Brian Swale. 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/