Subject: | Re: [OM] Definition of "Normal" |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 12 May 2011 11:25:18 +1000 |
> Bill Pearce <billcpearce@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > The term normal has too many implications. I think the older term > standard > lens means more or less as you prefer. The very idea of normal for a > lens > isn't really productive, it doesn't mean a thing. > Maybe similar meaning to a "normal" Oly List subscriber ! ...Wayne Wayne Harridge http://lrh.structuregraphs.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 18: music, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Definition of "Normal", Wayne Harridge |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Definition of "Normal", George Themelis |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Definition of "Normal", Wayne Harridge |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |