Yes, to put it in short: intuition is a 'flash of perception'.
Fernando.
2011/5/12 Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Exactly. The photographer has the flash of perception that alerts him or her
> to the possibility of an engaging image. The later viewer is afforded an
> opportunity to experience something akin to that flash of perception, but it
> really isn't the same thing at all.
>
> When I was a kid in western North Carolina, I used to go fishing. Fished
> until I realized I didn't have to carry all that crap around just to sit on a
> rock by the river and watch the water go by. <g> Now, I carry a bunch of
> camera crap around to capture images, but the important part is the seeing,
> and to see, you have to be there. No image, no matter how wonderfully
> rendered, is a substitute for being there at the flash of perception. IMHO,
> of course.
>
> --Bob
>
>
> On May 11, 2011, at 4:15 PM, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
>
>> Absolutely.
>>
>> At first instance, the photographer is the viewer ...but an intuitive
>> viewer of a maybe engaging scene.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|