Nothing to be sad about. I have concluded that the 4/3 format (as opposed to
Micro 4/3) is a dead end. I too have received my K5 but no lenses yet, they
should arrive this week. But just looking at the K5 body, it seems much more
compact than the E3 I used have, and houses a significantly larger sensor.
Enough said.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
YNWA
On Mar 6, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> Well, I've bought a Pentacchio K5 with a couple of lenses and they are much
> lighter than the (near) equivalent of E-3, 12-60 and 50-200. The facilities
> on the SLR are quite a difference from the E-3: for instance, I am quite
> taken with the 2 levels and display orientation.
>
> I have my EPL-2 to keep my Oly connection going, but I'm sad to be selling my
> Oly DSLR. If the E5 had been a more manageable price, such as less than
> GBP1000, I might have been tempted to stay "heavy" with the DSLR, but it's
> going to take a while before that happens.
>
> Oh well; best I get out and do good things photographic.
>
> Chris
>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|