Subject: | Re: [OM] Wow, is the 35/2.8 really this good? |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:53:41 -0500 |
Snapshot or not it still makes a great "environmental" portrait. Chuck Norcutt On 2/24/2011 11:55 AM, Nicholas Herndon wrote: > Thanks Chuck and Moose for the comments. Moose is correct, that > picture was not intended to be seen as a portrait, but rather a > snapshot. And I agree, the fireplace makes it. I am extremely pleased > with the Oly E-P2 overall. It has not disappointed. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] IMGs, Pt. Reyes, weather (and especially for Michael Collins), usher99 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 23/2/2011: the limits of light, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Wow, is the 35/2.8 really this good?, Nicholas Herndon |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Wow, is the 35/2.8 really this good?, Nicholas Herndon |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |