Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Wow, is the 35/2.8 really this good?

Subject: Re: [OM] Wow, is the 35/2.8 really this good?
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:40:51 -0500
I meant to add that I love this shot despite the fact that it violates 
one of my key rules for portraits which is that folks should generally 
be shown looking into the image rather than out of it.  Just goes to 
show that rules are made to be broken.  But this would be a dramatically 
different image if it weren't for the fireplace or if the fire wasn't 
burning.

Chuck Norcutt

On 2/23/2011 11:37 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I love "Pontificating" (3rd image down on the first page)
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 2/23/2011 10:47 AM, Nicholas Herndon wrote:
>> Ken, I'm glad you said that about the 35/2.  I always heard about its
>> poor performance, then decided to try it myself.  It is in fact a
>> stunning performer.  I bought a copy from John H, then sold it to a
>> friend and quickly regretted it.  He just recently sold it back to me.
>>    Here's a shot I took with it recently (first image in my stream):
>> www.flickr.com/pooroldpunch (OM-4T, Portra 400NC, handheld at f2.8 or
>> f4).  Bokeh on this lens can be busy at times, but usually not too
>> distracting. One very interesting observation: in the Olympus OM
>> System Handbook, a large percentage of the published images were with
>> the 35/2.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz