I've got to dig out the original slide and see if there's actual detail to
recapture. Failing that, we're due another Arctic blast early next week, so I
may bundle up and wander down to the beach to see if a re-shoot is possible.
(If I do, I'll have to go in on snowshoes; the while stuff is thick on the
ground here and getting thicker.)
Speaking of which, I find that re-shoots rarely work out. Once in a while I'll
get something I like better than the original, but then with seaweed it's
doubtful anything like the original configuration will be there.
--Bob Whitmire
www.bobwhitmire.com
On Jan 23, 2011, at 11:40 PM, Moose wrote:
> Not sure it needs a drum scan, though it couldn't hurt. According to the
> photo-i reviews, my Canon 9950F flatbed is
> quite a bit better than an E-2450, and I can resolve enough detail beyond
> that with the FS4000 film scanner that it
> should make a difference at the larger sizes.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|