"Of course, my exposure and color balance are usually not always spot on.
That's why I shoot raw. :-)"
Me too ;~))
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 6:35 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Cambridge Botanical Gardens
> The only advantage to RAW is when it necessary to adjust pixel
> brightness levels for either exposure or color balance. If the exposure
> and color balance are spot on the JPEG will be all that's required. Of
> course, my exposure and color balance are usually not always spot on.
> That's why I shoot raw. :-)
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 1/12/2011 2:50 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>> Thanks for your comments, and you're right, on both counts, Moose.
>> But I hadn't realised that I would like the jpg result.
>>
>> I'm almost tempted to use only jpgs from the E-3: my main reason for
>> using RAW is that I might ruin the jpgs with too much fettling, but
>> of course that's a throwback to the way I used to process images --
>> in PS. Now that I use Aperture or LightZone that problem does not
>> apply.
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|