I've got home (I was on the train from London an hour ago) and I've
re-processed the shots of the gardens (HDR mk 2) and the Power Puff.
One problem with using jpgs is that using the HDR system tends to reduce the
colours available.
But I think that I tend to like darker tones and in that I'm different from
most on the List.
Chris
On 12 Jan 2011, at 05:19, Moose wrote:
>> I did this because I have read that the E-5 does a good job with jpgs and I
>> wondered what my E-3 would be like in these lighting conditions. All I did
>> was adjust the Exposure slightly and add Definition (LCE, I think). I
>> should be interested in anyone's thought on the matter; there's a selection
>> (5) here:
>>
>> http://threeshoes-photo.blogspot.com/
>
> I like all but the HDR. Maybe there's something wrong with my eyes, but HDR
> images almost always look both overdone and
> underdone at the same time to me. Here, the process has done terrible things
> to the sky, way over darkening it moving
> toward the top, while adding a strong, light halo along the skyline. In the
> meantime, it's flattened contrast and local
> contrast so as to make the foreground look like it was not shot in low sun.
>
> Shouldn't the scene look more like this?
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Barker/BotanicalGardenHDR.htm>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|