Subject: | Re: [OM] Another E-5 review |
---|---|
From: | John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:04:06 -0400 |
Does correctly interpreting "IQ" need a high "IQ" ? :-) jh ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Wijsmuller" <wijsmuller@xxxxxxxxx> To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 4:51 AM Subject: Re: [OM] Another E-5 review This might help < http://www.fotomagazin.de/test_technik/kamerabestenliste/index.php?kamerakategorie=2966 > ('bildqualität" is IQ, not build quality ;-) Regards, Frank 2010/11/14 SwissPace > > I am surprised about the lack of interest in it on the list though > compared to previous E pro bodies ;-) > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Saving the planet or just saving money?, Chris Barker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Another E-5 review, chucknorcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Another E-5 review, Frank Wijsmuller |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Another E-5 review, Jim Couch |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |