That would take the OM mount lenses I already have? The 21/? The 28/2? The
50/1.2? The 28-48? The 85/2? The 136/2.8? With a proper viewfinder? Som over
the stupid screens in the Canons?
Damn, I'm in!!!!
From: Ken Norton [mailto:ken@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 3:16 PM
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] Another E-5 review
> Oh I am very interested, just trying to resist temptation! :)
Not much temptation yet. I see the E-5 as a "practical" upgrade and
addition to my kit, but otherwise isn't drawing me in as a "must have"
camera. I'd rather spend the $1700 on film for the OMs.
You know that if they did a digital OM, I'd be unable to resist.
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
_____
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3256 - Release Date: 11/14/10
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|