Image Quality. I didn't understand it myself not so long ago.
Chuck Norcutt
> -------Original Message-------
> From: John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Olympus Camera Discussion <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [OM] Another E-5 review
> Sent: Nov 14 '10 11:04
>
> Does correctly interpreting "IQ" need a high "IQ" ? :-)
>
> jh
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Frank Wijsmuller" <wijsmuller@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 4:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [OM] Another E-5 review
>
>
> This might help
>
> <
>
> http://www.fotomagazin.de/test_technik/kamerabestenliste/index.php?kamerakategorie=2966
> >
>
> ('bildqualität" is IQ, not build quality ;-)
>
> Regards, Frank
>
>
> 2010/11/14 SwissPace
>
> >
> > I am surprised about the lack of interest in it on the list though
> > compared to previous E pro bodies ;-)
> >
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|