And a memory constrained Mac would have done what exactly?
Chuck Norcutt
On 10/28/2010 2:23 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> Just thought again about my first answer, Scott. Yes it is a hardware
> problem, and it might well be because there is too little RAM, but the reason
> for my bringing it up is:
>
> Because they are slow machines, for whatever reason, I suffer with the
> multiple copies of programmes. If I think that perhaps I haven't
> double-clicked properly and I do it again, I find out minutes later that the
> machine was being slow, that I now have 2 or 3 copies open and that my
> opening them has slowed the machine still further.
>
> I refer to my earlier post about frustration with some parts of Winders. :-)
>
> Chris
>
> On 28 Oct 2010, at 16:16, Scott Gomez wrote:
>
>> That, my friend, is a hardware issue. (And by the way, I loathe
>> Vista/Windows 7, I'd much rather have kept the UI from XP). Many, many IT or
>> purchasing departments have swallowed the "minimum operating requirements"
>> line(s) from Microsoft repeatedly over the years. Around here, we long ago
>> learned to at least double the minimum RAM requirement stated. 'Twas a
>> necessary move for self-preservation, as anything less would have resulted
>> in having to run from irate peasantry bearing torches and sharp farm
>> implements.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|