I think my digital pictures, especially those taken with the M8 and the 20mm
lens on the GF-1 are richer and better than anything I did not on color film.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
YNWA
On Oct 1, 2010, at 9:46 PM, John Hudson wrote:
> I am in need of a reality check !
>
> I have spent many hours this week using a Nikon 9000 Coolscan to scan
> numerous 35mm slides [K25 and K64] and colour negatives [Portra NC and VC]
> at high resolution with digital ICE set at normal and saving in TIFF format.
>
> All slides and negs were exposed using a Leica M or OM4T.
>
> Most, if not all, of the on-screen slide and neg scans seem to have a deeper
> and richer visual ambience than any digital images generated by my E3 and
> 12-60 lens.
>
> Do I need to get my eyes checked or is what I am sensing quite rational and
> to be expected ?
>
> If the latter, I might be drawn back to film again.
>
> jh
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
> database 5496 (20101001) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|