It will depend to a large part on the settings you have used with the scanning,
John. I could make my digital images less saturated, or my scans more so.
Chris
On 1 Oct 2010, at 20:46, John Hudson wrote:
> I am in need of a reality check !
>
> I have spent many hours this week using a Nikon 9000 Coolscan to scan
> numerous 35mm slides [K25 and K64] and colour negatives [Portra NC and VC]
> at high resolution with digital ICE set at normal and saving in TIFF format.
>
> All slides and negs were exposed using a Leica M or OM4T.
>
> Most, if not all, of the on-screen slide and neg scans seem to have a deeper
> and richer visual ambience than any digital images generated by my E3 and
> 12-60 lens.
>
> Do I need to get my eyes checked or is what I am sensing quite rational and
> to be expected ?
>
> If the latter, I might be drawn back to film again.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|