Since I haven't seen any of the scans you mentioned, I can't comment on it.
If you found scanning negative is better than digital then it is the
software adjustment from Nikonscan match your vision/taste better.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Hudson" <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Try scanning 6cm x 7cm colour negatives. The rich visual ambience is even
> greater than with 35mm. Mind you, the TIFF files so generated are about
> 500mb large !
>
> So far no one has commented as to whether what I am sensing about the rich
> visual ambience of scanned film over digital is rational or otherwise.
>
> jh
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Crawford" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 10:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [OM] romance of film
>
>
>>A good scanner makes a huge difference. I have the Coolscan 8000ED and I
>> feel the same way John does. Look at the color photos here:
>>
>> http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com/fine_art/portfolio/road-to-indiana/index.p
>> hp
>>
>> I have NEVER succeeded in getting this level of quality from any digital
>> camera, ever. These were shot on Ektachrome E100GX in a Mamiya 645.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Chris Crawford
>> Fine Art Photography
>> Fort Wayne, Indiana
>> 260-424-0897
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|