The new Canon 16-35/2.8 Mk II is reputed to be an excellent performer
(unlike its predecessor). It costs about the same as the Oly 7-14/4.
Chuck Norcutt
SwissPace wrote:
> I spoke with the photographer of the childrens charge conference we
> recently went to in germany who told me most of the german press
> photographers had now switched to nykon because of quality issues from
> canyon. I am beginning to wonder if that wouldn't provide the best
> compromise (like you saw). Lets see how I do with the caynon now though
> I have the range 50 - 200 covered and for wide I can use my oly glass
> with hyperfocal as my friend. If it wasn't for the 7-14 I think I would
> probably sell all my olympus digital gear.
>
> I will get a few days holiday soon to relax and hopefully take some nice
> pictures :-)
>
>
>
> On 09/07/2010 12:49, Bob Whitmire wrote:
>> Hey, that's a great lens! I wish Nykon would take a page from the
>> Canyon book and put out a couple of pro-grade f/4s. With cameras like
>> the D3 and D3x, noise isn't an issue, so not having f:2.8 really
>> wouldn't be that much of an issue.
>>
>> Enjoy the lens!
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|