That's exactly what I found, both Olympus and Canon DPP render more
pleasing/accurate color than ACR. For an image, color is the key not the
process, I don't mind the poor interface or what, only the results count. At
the mean time I don't found any problem with DPP's interface but there are
lots of problem with Olympus Master 2 though.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> But there are those on this list who insist that only the Oly software
> makes the correct colors from an Oly raw file. But I haven't a clue
> about that. I only know that if the Canon software did a better
> conversion than ACR I still wouldn't use it because the interface sucks
> in comparison. (and it's probably better than Oly if the Oly camera
> user interface and user's manual is any indication)
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>> I am late to this thread, but I have a stupid question: why do you
>> want this software on your computer in the first place? Since I
>> switched to digital in 2004, I have received programs like this from
>> Canon, Olympus, Leica, Panasonic and probably others, and without
>> exception, they have all sucked. Lightroom or ACDSee or some such is
>> all you need.
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|