----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Norton"
> >
>> I got a LX-3 for my young son, even it claimed the high ISO performance
>> is
>> better than previous LX-1 and LX-2 but I still found it is not that great
>> for low light.
>>
>
>
> A few months ago I attended a wedding in which the second-shooter was
> actually using an LX-3. What surprised me is that the resulting images
> that
> I did get to see were better than the ones shot by the primary shooter
> with
> a 50D.
>
It didn't say anything, how does it better? Ok, what I can think of is the
DOF of LX-3 is much BETTER.
C.H.Ling
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|