>
> I got a LX-3 for my young son, even it claimed the high ISO performance is
> better than previous LX-1 and LX-2 but I still found it is not that great
> for low light.
>
A few months ago I attended a wedding in which the second-shooter was
actually using an LX-3. What surprised me is that the resulting images that
I did get to see were better than the ones shot by the primary shooter with
a 50D.
BTW, anybody else notice that the Canon G-series has essentially dropped off
the face of the planet lately? A shame on one hand as it is a mighty fine
camera, but nice on the other hand because we're seeing the value in other
cameras which were drowned out by the DPR crowd.
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|