I have the 24/2 mounted on my 5D II most of the time, mainly to document our
daily life, it is great under a tight place like restaurant. I found it can
do almost anything a 40mm can do but not the other way round.
I got a LX-3 for my young son, even it claimed the high ISO performance is
better than previous LX-1 and LX-2 but I still found it is not that great
for low light.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Barker" <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Adding to what I wrote earlier, I sometimes think that I don't really need
> a wideangle. I use my GF-1 almost exclusively with my 20/1.7 and just
> adjust my position to get the framing right (as we always used to do :-)).
> But if I need to go to 24mm I have my rather useful little LX-3; so I
> carry both with me.
>
> Chris
>
> On 10 May 2010, at 09:42, C.H.Ling wrote:
>
>> I'm also on the market for a wide lens for my E-PL1, what put me off (a
>> little) is the small aperture of the Olympus 9-18 at the long end.
>> Instead
>> of reading what DP say may be it is better just to look at their samples:
>>
>> http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/reviewsamples/albums/olympus-m-zd-9-18mm-f4-5-6-review-samples/slideshow
>>
>> I will wait until early next year to see how their 12mm performs.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|