And camera makers are now trying the same post-processing tricks.
Chuck Norcutt
usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Hah,
> Reminds me what von Helmholtz said---if an instrument maker sent him
> the human eye--he would send it back. Much CA--may answer why so few
> short wavelength cones exist---probably only used for color
> determination with the more predominant yellow end used for higher
> resolution data. What really matters of course is the final
> constructed image the brain reconstructs of the external world, not the
> retinal image---seems the Great Instrument Maker fixes it in post.
>
> Mike
>
> http://sirl.stanford.edu/~bob/teaching/pdf/arth202/Mollon_ColourArtScience_sm.pdf
>
>
>
>
>
> This is an example of why the eye is a rather imperfect, but highly
> optimised
>> design, despite what old creationists used to claim about godly
> design
>> perfection in the eye!
>>
>> see curves here: http://www.wendycarlos.com/colorvis/conecurv.jpg
>> and discussion of opsins here :
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhodopsin
>> Tim Hughes
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
