Le 30 nov. 09 à 15:42, Piers Hemy a écrit :
> Can't speak for the Panasonic, but the ZD 7-14 could not be better
> protected
> against flare - I can't think of an occasion when flare has been
> evident,
> even with the sun in the frame.
>
My experience, I know I like breaking the rules ...
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Angels/Engelberg-Angels-11-1140306.jpg.html
And mind you, I love the lens.
Philippe
> Piers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carlos J. Santisteban [mailto:zuiko21@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 29 November 2009 09:37
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] Lumix 7-14, was: IMG: Angels-01 - Carlos
>
> --snip
>
> From: Dawid Loubser <dawidl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Of course, as you know Phillipe,
>> the 7-14mm is a huge lens, heavy,
> --snip
>> and one cannot mount optical filters
>> in front of that fisheye-like bulbous front element.
>
> Here the Panasonic has little advantage, it has no filter thread
> either. But
> its front element has a moderate curvature -- could it be better
> protected
> against flare?
>
> --snip
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
